Article Sidebar

Submitted
Aug 30, 2021
Accepted
Oct 5, 2021
Published
Oct 31, 2021
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 625 Download : 613

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Every government program certainly has the support of the local government to the bottom, such as the village government. Likewise, with the Village Building Index (IDM) program, of course, every local government is racing to succeed even, by all means, will try to get achievements from the program. But in the Ngroto Village Government, by carrying out village government functions as usual, by existing rules get achievements as a village with the highest IDM score at the National level in 2018.  This research uses qualitative methods with the approach of intrinsic case study Robert K. Yin. Indeed, this approach received a lot of criticism since its emergence because it was considered weak analysis, not objective, and full of bias,  but in research not only “why,†but also “how†Ngroto Village Government with its habit got maximum results. With this approach, researchers can explore and elaborate in-depth and comprehensively.  The case study wants to know more deeply when the village government is not oriented towards achievement or achievement can become the village government with the highest national score. The village government applies legal regulations such as the implementation of musdes and musdus to filter aspirations and involve the community in planning development programs (participatory). Such efforts continue to be carried out by the village government to achieve achievements and are now a pilot center for other village governments.

Keywords

index development village village government development

Article Details

How to Cite
Anggraini, N., & Sutopo, D. (2021). Village Government Efforts in Realizing the Highest National Building Village Index (IDM) in Ngroto Village. Ecoplan, 4(2), 142-150. https://doi.org/10.20527/ecoplan.v4i2.388
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2014). Kajian indikator Sustainable Development Goals ( SDGs ). Badan Pusat Statistik, 1–172.
  2. Devyana, N. S. (2020). PEMBERDAYAAN MASYARAKAT DESA ( Studi Kasus : Desa Ngroto , Kecamatan Pujon , Kabupaten Malang ). Jurnal Ilmiah.
  3. Ghassani, D. (2017). Mitigasi Bencana Alam Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Dalam Masyarakat Desa Rawan Bencana. Skripsi Depertemen Sosiologi, Fakultasi Ilmo Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Airlangga, 4–5.
  4. Kementerian Desa, P. D. T. dan T. (2015). Index Desa Membangun.
  5. Kementrian Dalam Negeri. (2015). Buku Induk Kode dan Data Wilayah Administrasi Pemerintahan per Provinsi, Kabupaten/Kota Dan Kecamatan Seluruh Indonesia. Kementrian Dalam Negeri. http://www.kemendagri.go.id/media/documents/2015/02/25/l/a/lampiran_i.pdf
  6. Maolani, D. Y. (2019). Strengthening Village and Village Government Towards Sustainable Development in the Framework of Increasing Community …. JISPO Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 9(2), 36–49. http://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/jispo/article/view/5113/0
  7. Mattoasi, M., Cuga, C., Sarlin, M., & Sudirman, S. (2021). Keseimbangan Model Pengelolaan Dana Desa untuk Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Pesisir Kabupaten Bonebolango. Ecoplan, 4(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.20527/ecoplan.v4i1.227
  8. Meylavinasari, K., Purnomo, A., & Ruja, I. N. (2020). Perubahan Sosial Petani Penerima Program Bumdes Ageng Di Desa Ngroto Kecamatan Pujon Kabupaten Malang. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 9(2), 222. https://doi.org/10.23887/jish-undiksha.v9i2.17778
  9. Mulyadi, D., Aridhayandi, M. R., Hukum, D. F., Fakultas, A., Universitas, H., & Jurdil, L. (2019). Jurnal Mimbar Justitia. 42, 532–549.
  10. Nieminen, S. H., & Sajaniemi, N. (2016). Mindful awareness in early childhood education. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 6(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v6i1.399
  11. Nooteboom, G. (2019). Understanding the Nature of Rural Change: The Benefits of Migration and the (Re)creation of Precarity for Men and Women in Rural Central Java, Indonesia. TRaNS, 07(01).
  12. Robert K, Y. (2013). Studi Kasus Desain dan Metode Penelitin. Rajawali Press.
  13. Setyobakti, H. M. (2018). Identification of Village Problems and Potentials Based on Village Development Index (IDM) in Gondowangi Village, Wagir District, Malang Regency. Wiga: Journal of Economic Research, 7(1), 1–14.
  14. Setyowati, E. (2019). Tata Kelola Pemerintahan Desa Pada Perbedaan Indeks Desa Membangun (IDM): Studi Tiga Desa di Kabupaten Malang. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 53(9), 1689–1699.
  15. Steffy Adelia Tindi. (2015). Peranan Pemerintah Desa Dalam Perencanaan Pembangunan Studi Di Desa Pineleng Dua Kecamatan Pineleng. Jurnal Politico, 4(2).
  16. Subekan, A. (2020). Analisis Kesuksesan Pengelolaan Keuangan Desa: Studi Kasus Desa Ngroto, Kecamatan Pujon, Kabupaten Malang, Jawa Timur. Jurnal Widyaiswara Indonesia, 1(1), 47–60.
  17. Suwandi, & Rostyaningsih, D. (2012). Perencanaan Pembangunan Partisipatif di Desa Surakarta Kecamatan Suranenggala Kabupaten Cirebon. Journal of Public Policy and Management Review, 1(2), 261–270.
  18. Syafar, M., & Ulumi, H. F. B. (2021). From Community Capital to Sustainable Rural Livelihood: Exploring Green Development Program in Masoso, Indonesia. Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat: Media Pemikiran Dan Dakwah Pembangunan, 5(1), 77–104. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpm.2021.051-04
  19. Wakhid, A. A. (2011). Eksistensi Konsep Birokrasi Max Weber Dalam Reformasi Birokrasi Di Indonesia. Jurnal TAPIs, 7(2), 125–146. http://ejournal.iainradenintan.ac.id/index.php/TAPIs/article/view/100
  20. Www.desa.lokadata.id. (2019). Teknis Perhitungan Indeks Desa Membangun. https://desa.lokadata.id/artikel/teknis-perhitungan-indeks-desa-membangun