Article Sidebar

Submitted
Sep 26, 2024
Accepted
Nov 1, 2024
Published
Nov 6, 2024
Download
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)
Statistic
Read Counter : 723 Download : 1282

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Liquid e-cigarettes have become a popular new form of addictive tobacco products. The increasing prevalence of e-cigarette and smoking behaviors has led the government to increase tobacco tax rates every year. While this policy boosts state revenues, it also poses challenges for conventional and e-cigarette businesses, including tobacco farmers. Excise tariffs for liquid e-cigarettes are divided into open and closed system types, with the method of filling the liquid is the key distinction. Users can manually refill the open system, the closed system cannot be refilled. Despite both containing cigarette liquid, the percentage of raising excise taxes is higher for the open system than the closed system. This study aims to evaluate the effect of the increase of excise taxes on business competition between open and closed systems of liquid e-cigarettes. Using descriptive analysis, literature review, and a basic quantitative approach, this study found that differences in excise tax rates on e-cigarettes encourage competition and create unequal treatments. The higher excise tax on open systems has created a polemic in sustainability of small entrepreneurs in the tobacco sector. The role of the government as a regulator is very important in ensuring fair and responsive policies in order to create conducive business competition between open and closed system liquid e-cigarettes.

Article Details

How to Cite
Yunani, A., Muzdalifah, M., & Lestari, H. (2024). Efektifkah Kenaikan Tarif Cukai Rokok Elektrik Cair Sistem Terbuka bagi Industri Rokok Elektrik?. Ecoplan, 7(2), 186-197. https://doi.org/10.20527/ecoplan.v7i2.1007
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Ahsan, A., & Nadira Amalia; Krisna Puji Rahmayanti; Nadhila Adani; Nur Hadi Wiyono; Althof Endawansa; Maulida Gadis Utami; Adela Miranti Yuniar. (2023). Pajak Kesehatan di Indonesia: Tantangan, Aspirasi Daerah, dan Analisis Media . UI Publishing.
  2. Ashour, A. M. (2023). Use of vaping as a smoking cessation aid: a review of clinical trials. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 2137–2144.
  3. Barbeau, E. M., & Levenstein, C. (1999). Feeling the heat: displaced tobacco workers in North Carolina. New solutions: A journal of environmental and occupational health policy, 9(1), 65–80.
  4. BPOM. (2017). Kajian Rokok Elektronik di Indonesia, Edisi 2 (II). BPOM RI.
  5. Chaloupka, F. J., Powell, L. M., & Warner, K. E. (2019). The use of excise taxes to reduce tobacco, alcohol, and sugary beverage consumption. Annual review of public health, 40(1), 187–201.
  6. Chaloupka, F. J., Yurekli, A., & Fong, G. T. (2012). Tobacco taxes as a tobacco control strategy. Tobacco control, 21(2), 172–180.
  7. Cnossen, S. (2005). Theory and practice of excise taxation: smoking, drinking, gambling, polluting, and driving. Oxford University Press.
  8. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  9. Elmahdy, M., Mahgoup, E., Ewees, M., Eid, M., Abdelghany, T., & Zweier, J. (2021). Role of Nicotine and Exposure Duration in the Cardiovascular Toxicity of Electronic Cigarettes and Tobacco Cigarettes in a Long‐term Mouse Exposure Model. The FASEB Journal, 35.
  10. Gunardi, G., Veranita, M., Agung, T., & Febyola, D. (2021). Pengaruh kebijakan pengenaan tarif cukai rokok. Jurnal Co Management, 4(2), 710–720.
  11. He, Y., Ma, S., Yang, Q., & Shang, C. (2023). How cigarette excise tax pass-through to prices responds to the uptake and evolution of e-cigarettes (ECs). Tobacco Control.
  12. Hidayat, A., & Surjono, N. D. (2016). Impact of specific excise rate simplification on cigarette consumption and government revenue in Indonesia. World Customs Journal, 10(1), 73–100.
  13. Huesca, L., Llamas, L., & Sobarzo, H. (2022). Tobacco industry in Mexico: a general equilibrium analysis. Tobacco Control, 31(Suppl 2), s118–s123.
  14. Indonesian Youth Council for Tobacco Control (IYCTC). (2022). Rokok Elektronik: Baju Baru Bisnis Adiktif.
  15. ITPC Osaka. (2018). Cigarette HS 2402: Laporan Informasi Intelejen Bisnis 2018.
  16. Laffer, A. B. (2004). The Laffer curve: Past, present, and future. Backgrounder, 1765(1), 1–16.
  17. Makarim, M. M., & Purwana, A. S. (2022). Kenaikan dan Penyederhanaan Tarif Cukai Untuk Menurunkan Pengeluaran Konsumsi Rokok dan Prevalensi Perokok Remaja. Jurnal Informasi, Perpajakan, Akuntansi, Dan Keuangan Publik, 17(1), 57–78.
  18. McNeill, A. L. S. B. R. C. L. B. D. R. (2018). Evidence review of e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products 2018. Public Health England (PHE) Publication.
  19. Münzel, T., Kuntic, M., Steven, S., Hahad, O., & Daiber, A. (2020). Is vaping better than smoking cigarettes? Oxford University Press.
  20. ND, M. F. (2022). Evaluasi Kebijakan Tarif Cukai Rokok Elektrik Guna Mendorong Persaingan Usaha Yang Sehat. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia, 3(2), 230–249.
  21. Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 146/PMK.010/2017, Pub. L. No. Nomor 146/PMK.010/2017 (2017).
  22. Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 156/PMK.010/2018, Pub. L. No. Nomor 156/PMK.010/2018 (2018).
  23. Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 191/PMK.010/2022, Pub. L. No. Nomor 191/PMK.010/2022 (2022).
  24. Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 192/PMK.010/2021, Pub. L. No. Nomor 192/PMK.010/2021 (2021).
  25. Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 192/PMK.010/2022, Pub. L. No. Nomor 192/PMK.010/2022 (2022).
  26. Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 193/PMK.010/2021, Pub. L. No. Nomor 193/PMK.010/2021 (2021).
  27. Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 198/PMK.010/2020, Pub. L. No. Nomor 198/PMK.010/2020 (2020).
  28. PPEI. (2024). Data Rokok Elektrik Cair. Dalam PPEI.
  29. Rose, J. J., Krishnan-Sarin, S., Exil, V. J., Hamburg, N. M., Fetterman, J. L., Ichinose, F., Perez-Pinzon, M. A., Rezk-Hanna, M., & Williamson, E. (2023). Cardiopulmonary impact of electronic cigarettes and vaping products: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 148(8), 703–728.
  30. Solihat, S. S., & Gunadi, G. (2023). Urgensi kebijakan kenaikan tarif cukai rokok elektrik di Indonesia. Owner: Riset dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 7(3), 2389–2400.
  31. Susilawati, N., Abyan, D., Aruan, S. C., & Angwyn, M. (2022). Does the increase in the cigarette excise tax affect cigarette consumption. International Journal of Public Health Science, 11(4), 1537–1552.
  32. Van Der Eijk, Y., Ping, G. T. P., Ong, S. E., Xin, G. T. L., Li, D., Zhang, D., Shuen, L. M., & Seng, C. K. (2022). E-cigarette markets and policy responses in Southeast Asia: a scoping review. International journal of health policy and management, 11(9), 1616.
  33. WHO. (2024). Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) Indonesia Report 2021.
  34. Yusuf, H., Wijaya, A. B., & Abdalla, F. (2023). Analisis Tarif Optimum Cukai Rokok. Jurnal Perspektif Bea dan Cukai, 7(2), 298–314.
  35. Yuwono, F., Munigar, W., Zakiyani, S. N., & Kurniati, P. S. K. (2024). Analisa Kebijakan Pemerintah Mengenai Beacukai Liquid (Rokok Elektrik) Terhadap Pengguna Vape. Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Sosial, 8(1), 1–11.